Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Man of Steel

The latest Superman film is shockingly dated. Despite the many technological advances made in the FX department (surely, this is one of the best-looking and realistic in the series) and the shakiest camerawork we’ve seen in a superhero movie (The Blair Witch Project or Cloverfield, anyone?), there is not much new here. What made the older films so charming, especially the ‘70s and ‘80s originals, were their believable lo-fi aesthetics (groundbreaking then) and Christopher Reeves, who had the acting smarts to make his Clark Kent memorable. Man of Steel, on the other hand, feels completely manufactured, down to the casting of the muscular but dull Henry Cavill in its titular role, and takes itself more seriously than it really should.

You know the story: Planet Krypton is in shambles, and Jor-El (Russell Crowe) decides to send his newborn son Kal-El (Cavill) to earth. Hot on Kal-El’s heels is General Zod (a ridiculously wild-eyed Michael Shannon), hell-bent on vengeance after Planet Krypton is destroyed. Kal-El apparently carries a secret code within him that Zod needs to extract for his attempt to recreate Krypton on Earth—cue the superfluous explosions and fast-paced fight sequences you’d expect from a typical blockbuster. In between all this madness, director Zack Snyder tries his darndest to retell Clark Kent (or Kal- El)’s conflicted childhood through a series of lame flashbacks straight out of a Sunday matinee, with Diane Lane and Kevin Costner as Kent’s parents, to lend the film gravitas.

But with all those fast-paced, gravity-defying action sequences scattered throughout the film (from start to finish, literally), you’ll need a will of steel not to get a headache over the course of this long-drawn mess (it’s 144 minutes). And for all his good looks, Cavill simply does not do enough to carry the role convincingly (screenwriter David S. Goyer is partly to be blamed for the predictable script), while better actors like Lane, Costner and Amy Adams as Lois Lane are relegated to the sidelines. A shame, really. If Snyder was less preoccupied with toppling building after toppling building (and more often than not, exploding gas station after exploding gas station) and more with actual plot developments and character expositions, the film would have actually taken flight.